Transcription of a

From ISMOC
Jump to: navigation, search

The scbA gene is transcribed into scbA mRNA (a).

Go back to overview
About this image

Chemical equation

O_{A} \rightarrow O_{A} + a (maximum transcription in the scenario where the activating complex AR_2 does not exist or basal transcription in the scenario where the activating complex AR_2 exists)
O_{A}-AR_{2} \rightarrow O_{A}-AR_{2} + a (maximum transcription in the scenario where the activating complex AR_2 exists)
O_{A}-R_{2} \rightarrow O_{A}-R_{2} + a (maximum transcription in the scenario where R_2 is an activator for scbA)
O_{A}-2R_{2} \rightarrow O_{A}-2R_{2} + a (maximum transcription in the scenario where R_2 is an activator for scbA)
O_{A}-R_{2}-AR_{2} \rightarrow O_{A}-R_{2}-AR_{2} + a (maximum transcription in the scenario where R_2 is an activator for scbA and the activating complex AR_2 exists)
O_{A}-2R_{2}-AR_{2} \rightarrow O_{A}-2R_{2}-AR_{2} + a (maximum transcription in the scenario where R_2 is an activator for scbA and the activating complex AR_2 exists)

Rate equation

 r= T_{A}\cdot [O_{A}](for overlapping promoters in the scenario where the activating complex AR_{2} does not exist)
 r= \Omega_{A}\cdot [O_{A}] (for isolated promoters in the scenario where the activating complex AR_{2} does not exist)
 r= T_{A}\cdot [O_{A}-AR_{2}](maximal transcription for overlapping promoters in the scenario which includes the AR_{2} complex)
 r= \Omega_{A}\cdot [O_{A}-AR_{2}] (maximal transcription for isolated promoters in the scenario which includes the AR_{2} complex)
 r= T_{A_{basal}}\cdot [O_{A}] (basal transcription for overlapping promoters in the scenario which includes the AR_{2} complex and/or R_{2} being an activator for scbA)
 r= \Omega_{A_{basal}}\cdot [O_{A}] (basal transcription for isolated promoters in the scenario which includes the AR_{2} complex and/or R_{2} being an activator for scbA)
 r= T_{A}\cdot [O_{A}-R_{2}](maximal transcription for overlapping promoters in the scenario where R_{2} is an activator for scbA)
 r= T_{A}\cdot [O_{A}-2R_{2}](maximal transcription for overlapping promoters in the scenario where R_{2} is an activator for scbA)
 r= \Omega_{A}\cdot [O_{A}-R_{2}] (maximal transcription for isolated promoters in the scenario where R_{2} is an activator for scbA complex)
 r= \Omega_{A}\cdot [O_{A}-2R_{2}] (maximal transcription for isolated promoters in the scenario where R_{2} is an activator for scbA complex)

Parameters

The parameters of this reaction are the basal and maximum transcription rate of scbA (T_{A} and T_{A_{basal}}). These parameters are derived by the strength of the promoter (\Omega_{A} and \Omega_{A_{basal}}) but also taking into account the transcriptional interference by the scbR promoter. In this model, we have assumed that the isolated promoter strength is equal to the number of transcripts produced per unit of time. Therefore, the parameters \Omega_{A} and \Omega_{A_{basal}} are assumed to be equal to the transcription rate constant of the isolated promoter. These parameter values were derived from published data on E.coli mRNA transcription rate and calculations based on genomic properties of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Additionally, the firing rate (elongation initiation rate) constant (k_{F}) is needed. This parameter is also derived from literature and is sampled from the same distribution for both scbR and scbA promoters, but is then divided by a heterogeneity factor \chi to calculate the final k_{F_A} for the scbA promoter. The heterogeneity factor for each promoter is sampled from a log-normal distribution.

Name Value Units Value in previous GBL models [1] [2] Remarks-Reference
\Omega_{A_{basal}} 0.001−0.2 [2] [3] [4] [5]  min^{-1} 8 \cdot 10^{-4} s^{-1} (0.048 min^{-1})[2]

Bistability range: 4 \cdot 10^{-5}-2.8 \cdot 10^{-3} s^{-1}[1]

(0.0024-0.168 min^{-1})

In the model investigating the quorum sensing switch in Vibrio fischeri, Weber et al. [3] have used the ratio between basal and maximal transcription rates of 0.01 and 0.001, based on the characteristics shown in the experiments by Williams et al. [5]. Through these ratios, an estimation on the range of basal transcription of our system can be made from the maximum transcription rate (\Omega_{A}), i.e.,  0.00011-0.0565 min^{-1}

Additionally, in the GBL model by Chatterjee et al. [2], the basal transcription rates employed are within the range 4 \cdot 10^{-5}-2.8 \cdot 10^{-3} s^{-1} (0.0024-0.168 min^{-1}). The values on which their parameters were used, were derived from in vitro studies in Escherichia coli by Nam et al. [4]

\Omega_{A} 0.11−5.65 [6] [7] [8]  min^{-1} 0.45 s^{-1} (27 min^{-1})[1][2]

Range tested: 10^{-4}-10 s^{-1}

(0.006-600 min^{-1})

Bistability range: 0.44-0.5 s^{-1}[1]

(26.4-30 min^{-1})

and 0.0225-0.9 s^{-1}[2]

(1.35-54 min^{-1})

In a recent publication by R.A. Cox, genomic properties and macromolecular compositions of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) and E.coli were reported, along with equations that connect these properties. For S. coelicolor, the polypeptide elongation rate ε_{aa} is reported to be 3.17 amino acids s-1, from which the mRNA elongation rate can be calculated according to Cox from the equation ε_{mRNA}= 3ε_{aa} (factor 3 reflects the number of nucleotides per codon), therefore resulting in 1.77 and 9.51 nucleotides \cdot s^{-1} as minimum and maximum values respectively. As ScbA has 945 pb, the transcription rate constant can be calculated as per \Omega_{A}=\frac{945 bp/gene}{1.77 bp/s}=533.9 s/gene=8.89 min/gene \Omega_{A}=\frac{945 bp/gene}{9.51 bp/s}=99.37 s/gene=1.66 min/gene, thus resulting in final values of  0.11 min^{-1} and  0.60 min^{-1} .
  • Cox et al. 2004[6]
  • Cox et al. 2004[6]

Additionally, Bremer et al. have reported an mRNA transcription rate of 55 noucleotides/s for E. coli, a value which is also shared by R.A. Cox, while Vogel et al. have published a range of mRNA transcription rates in the range of 28-89 noucleotides/s, depending on different growth rates of E. coli. By the same calculations, the corresponding transcription rate constants are  3.49 min^{-1} and  1.78-5.65 min^{-1} .

  • Bremer et al. 2004[7]
  • Vogel et al. 2004[8]
k_{F} 18.2−33 [9] [10] [11]  min^{-1} N/A Pai et al. reported a typical transcription initiation rate in QS systems to be 20 min^{-1}.
Pai et al. 2009 [9]

This value is also supported by Kennell et al. who calculated the transcription initiation rates from experimental data derived from in vitro experiments using E. coli. The results showed one initiation every 3.3 sec (therefore transcription rate 18.2 min^{-1}).

Kennell et al. 1977 [11]

Finally, Tadmor et al. reported a maximum transcription initiation rate of 33 min^{-1} in E. coli based on observational data.

Tadmor et al. 2008 [10]

T_{A} k_{F_{A}} \theta_{A}

In order to include the strength of the promoter in the transcription rate, the following formula is used: \frac{1}{k_{onA}}=\frac{1}{\Omega_{A}}-\frac{1}{k_{F_A}} [12]. In this way, a distribution with the values for parameter k_{onA} is obtained (rate of RNA polymerase binding the promoter), which is necessary to link the firing rate with the total transcription rate according to the formulas suggested by Bendtsen et al. [12]. From the k_{F_{A}} and the k_{onA}, the maximal occupancy for the isolated scbA promoter can be calculated by using the formula: \theta^o_{A}=\frac{k_{onA}}{k_{onA}+k_{F_{A}}}. The promoter aspect ratio \alpha_{A} is equal to \frac{k_{onA}}{k_{F_{A}}}, which leads to the equivalent equation \alpha_{A}=\frac{\theta^o_{A}}{1-\theta^o_{A}}. The total transcription rate in the case of the isolated (uncoupled) promoters is calculated through the formula: \Omega_{A}=k_{F_{A}} \cdot \theta^o_{A}. Similarly, the effective occupancy of the isolated scbR promoter (\theta^o_{R}) is calculated as described in theTranscription of r. In the case of the overlapping (coupled) promoters the maximal occupancy for the scbA promoter is \theta_{A}=\frac{\alpha_{A}+1}{\alpha_{R}+\alpha_{A}+1}, where \alpha_{R} is the promoter aspect ratio for the isolated scbR promoter. Therefore, the final transcription rate constant is calculated as per T_{A}=k_{F_{A}} \cdot \theta_{A} \cdot \theta^{o}_{A}=\Omega_{A} \cdot \theta_{A}.

Parameters with uncertainty

When deciding how to describe the uncertainty for this parameter we must take into consideration that the reported values are either calculated or derived with approximation from experiments and from other macromolecular properties. Additionally, some of the values correspond to mRNA transcription rates of different bacteria species (E. coli). This means that there might be a notable difference between actual parameter values and the ones reported in literature. These facts influence the quantification of the parameter uncertainty and therefore the shape of the corresponding distributions. Therefore, by assigning the appropriate weights to the parameter values and using the method described here, the appropriate probability distributions were designed.

Therefore, although the weight of the distribution is put on the values calculated for S. coelicolor by setting  0.57 min^{-1} as the mode of the log-normal distribution for the \Omega_{A}, we wish to explore the full range of reported values. Thus, the Spread is set to 3.5 and the range where 68.27% of the values are found is between 0.162 and 2.026 min^{-1}.

With regards to the firing rate k_F, the reported values are within the range of 18-33 min^{-1} with the most probable values being 18-20 min^{-1}. Since these values are reported as being the average rates (and 33 min^{-1} being the maximum), we will also sample lower values, so the final sampling range will be around the values 10-33 min^{-1}. The mode of the distribution is set to 20.7 min^{-1} and the Spread is set to 1.34. Therefore, the range where 68.27% of the values are found is between 15.4 and 27.8 min^{-1}.

From the literature values of \Omega_{A} and k_F, the values for k_{onA} are calculated. By assigning the same weights to each of the k_{onA} values as of the \Omega_{A} values, a distribution with a mode of 0.587 min^{-1} and a Spread of 3.875 is generated. The range where 68.27% of the values are found is between 0.151 and 2.28.

With regards to the basal transcription rate \Omega_{A_{basal}}, in order to explore the full range of the literature values, the mode was set to 0.0037 min^{-1} and the Spread to 10.93. Therefore the range where 68.27% of the values are found is between 0.00034 and 0.041.

As performed for k_{onA}, the values for k_{onA_{basal}} are calculated from the literature values of \Omega_{A_{basal}} and k_F. By assigning the same weights to each of the k_{onA_{basal}} values as of the \Omega_{A_{basal}} values, a distribution with a mode of 0.00373 min^{-1} and a Spread of 10.97 is generated. The range where 68.27% of the values are found is between 0.00034 and 0.0409.

Finally, the heterogeneity factor can be set so that k_{F_R}>k_{F_A} or k_{F_R}<k_{F_A}. In the first case, \chi has values within the range 1-10 and in the second within the range 0.1-0.9. In order for the two promoters to have equal strength, \chi is set to be equal to 1. Therefore, the mode of the heterogeneity factor \chi is 3 and the Spread is 1.2 (68.27% of the values are found between 2.5 and 3.6), in the case where scbR promoter is stronger. In the opposite case the mode is 0.4 and the Spread is 1.3 (68.27% of the values are found between 0.3 and 0.52).

The probability distributions for the parameters, adjusted accordingly in order to reflect the above values, are the following:

WAbasal.png WA.png KonA.png KonAbasal.png KFu.png Chi2.png

The values retrieved from literature and their weights are indicated by the blue dashed lines, and the uncertainty for each value is indicated using the reported experimental error (green lines) or a default value of 10% error (orange lines).

The parameter information of the distributions is:

Parameter Mode Spread μ σ
\Omega_{A} 0.572 3.5 0.2514 0.89956
\Omega_{A_{basal}} 0.0037 10.93 -3.8324 1.3259
k_{onA} 0.587 3.875 0.35255 0.94054
k_{onA_{basal}} 0.00373 10.97 -3.8297 1.3269
k_{F} 20.7 1.34 3.1107 0.28276
\chi(k_{F_R}<k_{F_A}) 0.4 1.3 -0.8517 0.2541

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 S. Mehra, S. Charaniya, E. Takano, and W.-S. Hu. A bistable gene switch for antibiotic biosynthesis: The butyrolactone regulon in streptomyces coelicolor. PLoS ONE, 3(7), 2008.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 A. Chatterjee, L. Drews, S. Mehra, E. Takano, Y.N. Kaznessis, and W.-S. Hu. Convergent transcription in the butyrolactone regulon in streptomyces coelicolor confers a bistable genetic switch for antibiotic biosynthesis. PLoS ONE, 6(7), 2011.
  3. 3.0 3.1 M. Weber and J. Buceta. Dynamics of the quorum sensing switch: Stochastic and non-stationary effects. BMC Systems Biology 2013,(7):6
  4. 4.0 4.1 Nam V. Vo, Lilian M. Hsu, Caroline M. Kane, Michael J. Chamberlin. In Vitro Studies of Transcript Initiation by Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase. 3. Influences of Individual DNA Elements within the Promoter Recognition Region on Abortive Initiation and Promoter Escape Biochemistry 2003,42(13),3798-3811
  5. 5.0 5.1 Williams JW, Cui X, Levchenko A, Stevens AM. Robust and sensitive control of a quorum-sensing circuit by two interlocked feedback loops. Molecular Systems Biology. 2008;4:234
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Cox RA. Quantitative relationships for specific growth rates and macromolecular compositions of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) and Escherichia coli B/r: an integrative theoretical approach. Microbiology. 2004 May;150(Pt 5):1413-26.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Bremer H., Yuan D. RNA chain growth-rate in Escherichia coli, Journal of Molecular Biology, 1968; 38:(2), p. 163-180
  8. 8.0 8.1 Vogel U., Jensen KF. The RNA chain elongation rate in Escherichia coli depends on the growth rate. Journal of Bacteriology. 1994;176(10):2807-2813.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Pai, A. and You, L. Optimal tuning of bacterial sensing potential. Mol Syst Biol. 2009; 5: 286
  10. 10.0 10.1 Tadmor AD, Tlusty T. A Coarse-Grained Biophysical Model of E. coli and Its Application to Perturbation of the rRNA Operon Copy Number. PLoS Comput Biol (2008); 4(5): e1000038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000038
  11. 11.0 11.1 Kennell D., Riezman H. Transcription and translation initiation frequencies of the Escherichia coli lac operon. J. Mol. Biol. 1977; 114(1):1-21
  12. 12.0 12.1 Bendtsen KM, Erdőssy J, Csiszovszki Z, et al. Direct and indirect effects in the regulation of overlapping promoters. Nucleic Acids Research. 2011;39(16):6879-6885. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr390.