Difference between revisions of "Degradation of C"

From ISMOC
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "The SCB1 protein (C) degrades. <imagemap> Image:Flowchart.png|150px|right|alt=Go back to overview default Welcome to the In-Silico Model of γ-butyrolactone regulation in St...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The SCB1 protein (C) degrades.
 
The SCB1 protein (C) degrades.
 
<imagemap>
 
<imagemap>
Image:Flowchart.png|150px|right|alt=Go back to overview
+
Image:Back button.png|150px|right|alt=Go back to overview
 
default [[Welcome to the In-Silico Model of γ-butyrolactone regulation in Streptomyces coelicolor|Go back to overview]]
 
default [[Welcome to the In-Silico Model of γ-butyrolactone regulation in Streptomyces coelicolor|Go back to overview]]
 
</imagemap>
 
</imagemap>

Revision as of 22:41, 28 September 2015

The SCB1 protein (C) degrades.

Go back to overview
About this image

Chemical equation

C\rightarrow \varnothing

Rate equation

 r= d_{C}\cdot[C]

Parameters

The parameter of this reaction is the degradation rate of C (d_{C}).

Name Value Units Origin Remarks
d_{C} 0-0.001 [1] min^{-1} Degradation rate of acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL) The assumption that the degradation of SCB1 is slower than AHL is made, as per Takano(2006)[2]

Parameters with uncertainty

The most plausible parameter value for the d_{C} is decided to be  0.0002 min^{-1} and the confidence interval  2 . This means that the mode of the PDF is 0.0002 and the range where 95% of the values are found is between 0.0001 and 0.0004 min^{-1}.

The probability distribution for the parameter, adjusted accordingly in order to reflect the above values, is the following:

500px

The location and scale parameters of the distribution are:

Parameter μ σ
d_{C} -8.4046 0.3356

References

  1. S. Basu, Y. Gerchman, C. H. Collins, F. H. Arnold & R. Weiss. A synthetic multicellular system for programmed pattern formation. Nature 434, 1130-1134, 2005
  2. E. Takano. γ-butyrolactones: Streptomyces signalling molecules regulating antibiotic production and differentiation. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 9(3):287–294, 2006.