Difference between revisions of "Binding of R2 to OA operator"

From ISMOC
Jump to: navigation, search
(Parameters with uncertainty)
(Parameters with uncertainty)
Line 61: Line 61:
 
When deciding how to describe the uncertainty for each parameter there are a few points to be taken into consideration. Firstly, the values reported in literature are spread in a relatively large range and correspond to different protein-operator binding reactions, although all are part of the same family of repressors (tetR). Additionally, the values were acquired by ''in vitro'' testing, although in some of the publications a strong correlation between ''in vitro'' and ''in vivo'' measurements is noted. This means that there might be a notable difference between actual parameter values and the ones reported in literature. These facts influence the quantification of the parameter uncertainty and therefore the shape of the corresponding distributions.  
 
When deciding how to describe the uncertainty for each parameter there are a few points to be taken into consideration. Firstly, the values reported in literature are spread in a relatively large range and correspond to different protein-operator binding reactions, although all are part of the same family of repressors (tetR). Additionally, the values were acquired by ''in vitro'' testing, although in some of the publications a strong correlation between ''in vitro'' and ''in vivo'' measurements is noted. This means that there might be a notable difference between actual parameter values and the ones reported in literature. These facts influence the quantification of the parameter uncertainty and therefore the shape of the corresponding distributions.  
  
More specifically, with regards to the <math>K_{d2}</math>, the value that is considered as the most accurate in different publications is <math> 0.005 nM </math> measured by Kleinschmidt et al. However, the K<sub>d</sub>s measured for the ActR protein in ''S. coelicolor'' cover the range of <math> 0.1-5.8 nM </math>. Therefore, we decided to sample values from the whole range of <math> 0.005-5.8 nM </math> but to keep the weight of the distribution close to the values reported by Kleinschmidt et al. In this context, the mode of the log-normal distribution chosen for the <math>K_{d2}</math> is <math> 0.15 nM </math> which is within the range of the values reported for ''S. coelicolor'' and the confidence interval is <math> 20 </math> in order to be able to explore a wide range of values and thus take into account the uncertainty caused by both the ''in vitro'' testing and the measurements in different species and proteins. Thus, that the range where 95% of the values are found is between 0.0075 and 3 nM.
+
More specifically, with regards to the <math>K_{d2}</math>, the value that is considered as the most accurate in different publications is <math> 0.005 nM </math> measured by Kleinschmidt et al. However, the K<sub>d</sub>s measured for the ActR protein in ''S. coelicolor'' cover the range of <math> 0.1-5.8 nM </math>. Therefore, we decided to sample values from the whole range of <math> 0.005-5.8 nM </math> but to keep the weight of the distribution close to the values reported by Kleinschmidt et al. In this context, the mode of the log-normal distribution chosen for the <math>K_{d2}</math> is <math> 0.15 nM </math> which is within the range of the values reported for ''S. coelicolor'' and the confidence interval factor is <math> 20 </math> in order to be able to explore a wide range of values and thus take into account the uncertainty caused by both the ''in vitro'' testing and the measurements in different species and proteins. Thus, that the range where 95% of the values are found is between 0.0075 and 3 nM.
  
Similarly, the value calculated for the <math>k^{-}_{2}</math> by the measurements of Kleinschmidt et al. is <math>0.09 min^{-1}</math>, however other studies reported values of up to <math>0.85 min^{-1}</math>. Therefore, in order to explore the full range of potential values and take into account the uncertainty caused by the factors described above, the mode of the log-normal distribution chosen for the <math>k^{-}_{2}</math> is <math>0.3 min^{-1}</math> and the confidence interval <math>3.5</math>. This means that the range where 95% of the values are found is between 0.086 and 1.05 <math>min^{-1}</math>.
+
Similarly, the value calculated for the <math>k^{-}_{2}</math> by the measurements of Kleinschmidt et al. is <math>0.09 min^{-1}</math>, however other studies reported values of up to <math>0.85 min^{-1}</math>. Therefore, in order to explore the full range of potential values and take into account the uncertainty caused by the factors described above, the mode of the log-normal distribution chosen for the <math>k^{-}_{2}</math> is <math>0.3 min^{-1}</math> and the confidence interval factor is <math>3.5</math>. This means that the range where 95% of the values are found is between 0.086 and 1.05 <math>min^{-1}</math>.
  
 
The probability distributions for the two parameters, adjusted accordingly in order to reflect the above values, are the following:
 
The probability distributions for the two parameters, adjusted accordingly in order to reflect the above values, are the following:

Revision as of 05:48, 11 October 2015

The ScbR homo-dimer (R2) binds to the ScbA gene operator (OA) and represses its mRNA transcription.

Go back to overview
About this image

Chemical equation

O_{A} + 2R_{2} \rightleftharpoons O_{A}-R_{2}

Rate equation

 r= \frac{k^{-}_{2}}{K_{d2}}\cdot [O_{A}]\cdot [R_{2}]^{2} - k^{-}_{2}\cdot [O_{A}-R_{2}]

Parameters

The parameters of this reaction are the dissociation constant for binding of ScbR to OA (K_{d2}) and the dissociation rate for binding of ScbR to OA (k^{-}_{2}). ScbR is a member of the TetR family of repressors, named after the member of this group which is the most completely characterized, the TetR repressor protein. TetR binds to the operator tetO, repressing its own expression and that of the efflux determinant tetA in a similar way as ScbR binding to OR and OA and repressing its own expression and the expression of ScbA. Therefore parameter values were derived from published data on the TetR-tetO interaction and on tetR-like proteins binding to their corresponding operators.

Name Value Units Value in previous GBL models [1] [2] Remarks-Reference
K_{d2} 0.005 - 5.8 [3] [4] [5] [6] nM 7.44 nM

(Range tested: 10^{-5}-10 nM)

(Bistability range: 7.30-8.30 nM)

An early publication based on stopped-flow measurements at various salt concentrations reports a KA of 2 \cdot 10^{11} M^{-1} [3], therefore a Kd (\frac{1}{K_a}) of 0.005 nM .
Kleinschmidt et al. 1988[3]

Data derived from equilibrium SPR analysis of TetR-tetO interaction report a Ka of 5.6 \pm 2 nM^{-1}[4], therefore a Kd (\frac{1}{K_a}) of 0.179 \pm 0.5 nM.

Kamionka et al. 2004 [4]

Additionally, a study on the TetR-like protein Rv3066 binding to the mmr operon in M. tuberculosis suggests a Kd of 4.4 \pm 0.3 nM.[5]

Bolla et al. 2012 [5]

Finally, in vitro studies on TetR-like protein ActR in S. coelicolor suggest a Kd in the range of 0.1-5.8 nM [6]

Ahn et al. 2007 [6]
k^{-}_{2} 0.09-0.85 [3] [7] min^{-1} N/A According to the study by Kleinschmidt et al.[3] mentioned above, the maximal association rate constant was k_{a}= 3 \cdot 10^{8} M^{-1} s^{-1}. By taking into account the equilibrium association constant reported above (K_{A}=2 \cdot 10^{11} M^{-1}), the dissociation rate constant can be calculated as per k_{2}= \frac{k_a}{K_A}=\frac{3 \cdot 10^{8} M^{-1} s^{-1}}{2 \cdot 10^{11} M^{-1}}=0.0015 s^{-1}= 0.09 min^{-1}.
Kleinschmidt et al. 1988[3]

Additionally, a study on a TetR-like protein (RolR) which binds to its operator rolO and blocks the transcription of rolHMD and of its own gene, in Corynebacterium glutamicum (Gram positive and GC content ~ 50-60% bacteria) reports the dissociation rates 1.41 \cdot 10^{-2} s^{-1} (0.846 min^{-1}) and 7.34 \cdot 10^{-3}s^{-1} (0.44 min^{-1}) [7] measured by surface plasmon resonance (SPR).

Li et al. 2012[7]

Parameters with uncertainty

When deciding how to describe the uncertainty for each parameter there are a few points to be taken into consideration. Firstly, the values reported in literature are spread in a relatively large range and correspond to different protein-operator binding reactions, although all are part of the same family of repressors (tetR). Additionally, the values were acquired by in vitro testing, although in some of the publications a strong correlation between in vitro and in vivo measurements is noted. This means that there might be a notable difference between actual parameter values and the ones reported in literature. These facts influence the quantification of the parameter uncertainty and therefore the shape of the corresponding distributions.

More specifically, with regards to the K_{d2}, the value that is considered as the most accurate in different publications is  0.005 nM measured by Kleinschmidt et al. However, the Kds measured for the ActR protein in S. coelicolor cover the range of  0.1-5.8 nM . Therefore, we decided to sample values from the whole range of  0.005-5.8 nM but to keep the weight of the distribution close to the values reported by Kleinschmidt et al. In this context, the mode of the log-normal distribution chosen for the K_{d2} is  0.15 nM which is within the range of the values reported for S. coelicolor and the confidence interval factor is  20 in order to be able to explore a wide range of values and thus take into account the uncertainty caused by both the in vitro testing and the measurements in different species and proteins. Thus, that the range where 95% of the values are found is between 0.0075 and 3 nM.

Similarly, the value calculated for the k^{-}_{2} by the measurements of Kleinschmidt et al. is 0.09 min^{-1}, however other studies reported values of up to 0.85 min^{-1}. Therefore, in order to explore the full range of potential values and take into account the uncertainty caused by the factors described above, the mode of the log-normal distribution chosen for the k^{-}_{2} is 0.3 min^{-1} and the confidence interval factor is 3.5. This means that the range where 95% of the values are found is between 0.086 and 1.05 min^{-1}.

The probability distributions for the two parameters, adjusted accordingly in order to reflect the above values, are the following:

500px 500px

The location and scale parameters of the distributions are:

Parameter μ σ
K_{d2} -0.7010 1.094
k^{-}_{2} -0.8890 0.5612

References

  1. S. Mehra, S. Charaniya, E. Takano, and W.-S. Hu. A bistable gene switch for antibiotic biosynthesis: The butyrolactone regulon in streptomyces coelicolor. PLoS ONE, 3(7), 2008.
  2. A. Chatterjee, L. Drews, S. Mehra, E. Takano, Y.N. Kaznessis, and W.-S. Hu. Convergent transcription in the butyrolactone regulon in streptomyces coelicolor confers a bistable genetic switch for antibiotic biosynthesis. PLoS ONE, 6(7), 2011.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 Kleinschmidt C., Tovar K., Hillen W., Porschke D. Dynamics of repressor-operator recognition: Tn10-encoded tetracycline resistance control. Biochemistry, 1988, 27(4), pp. 1094–1104.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Kamionka A, Bogdanska-Urbaniak J, Scholz O, Hillen W. Two mutations in the tetracycline repressor change the inducer anhydrotetracycline to a corepressor. Nucleic Acids Research. 2004;32(2):842-847.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Bolla JR, Do SV, Long F, et al. Structural and functional analysis of the transcriptional regulator Rv3066 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nucleic Acids Research. 2012;40(18):9340-9355.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Ahn SK, Tahlan K, Yu Z, Nodwell J. Investigation of Transcription Repression and Small-Molecule Responsiveness by TetR-Like Transcription Factors Using a Heterologous Escherichia coli-Based Assay. Journal of Bacteriology. 2007;189(18):6655-6664.
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 Li T, Zhao K, Huang Y, et al. The TetR-Type Transcriptional Repressor RolR from Corynebacterium glutamicum Regulates Resorcinol Catabolism by Binding to a Unique Operator, rolO. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2012;78(17):6009-6016.