User:Assessor
I Highly motivated and well organised student, who only occasionally needs advice or guidance; able to design own experiments; clearly shows initiative and ability to work independently; combines manual dexterity with careful logical approach to new techniques; reliable results; will make an excellent research worker. Highly motivated and well organised student, who only occasionally needs advice or guidance; able to design own resources and evaluation; clearly shows initiative, ability to work independently and a careful logical approach; skilful and shows clarity of ideas; Participates fully in online discussions and demonstrates critical evaluation in the peer review process. Excellent technical skills Highly motivated and well organised student, who only occasionally needs advice or guidance; able to design own resources; clearly shows initiative, ability to work independently and a careful logical approach; excellent interaction with the instructor. Highly motivated and well organised student, who only occasionally needs advice or guidance; able to organise own source material collection; shows initiative, ability to work independently and a careful methodical approach; excellence in preparation of final report. 95-100% Shows all of the above attributes 85-90%% Shows most of the above attributes 70-80% Shows many of the above attributes II(i) 60-65% Good student, needing some advice, but generally carries out work skilfully and accurately; reliable results; shows strong signs that could be a good research student. Good student, needing some advice, but generally carries out work competently and logically.
Participates in on-line discussion. Good student, needing some advice, but generally carries out work competently and logically.
II(ii) 50-55% Average student, needing regular advice; generally adequate technique, with some mistakes; planning of work and use of time not well organized; mainly follows directions. III 40-45% Below-average student, needing regular advice and not always putting this into practice; with obvious deficiencies in technique and application. Below-average student, needing regular advice and not always putting this into practice; with obvious deficiencies in technique and application. Poor participation in peer review. Below-average student, needing regular advice and not always putting this into practice; with obvious deficiencies in technique and application. Poor interaction with the instructor.
Below-average student, needing regular advice and not always putting this into practice; with obvious deficiencies in application. Fail + 35% Poor student, with little commitment; attendance unreliable; has difficulty following instructions; data inaccurate, suspect, or scanty.
Poor student, with little commitment; attendance unreliable; has difficulty following instructions. Does not engage in peer review. Poor student, with little commitment; attendance unreliable; has difficulty following instructions. Poor student, with little commitment; attendance unreliable; has difficulty following instructions. Fail 0-30% Very poor student; lacks motivation, and fails to respond to encouragement; very poor student, who has little skill and no respect for apparatus; attendance unreliable; misses appointments; data lacking or unreliable; cannot follow simple instructions. Very poor student; lacks motivation, and fails to respond to encouragement; very poor student who has little skill or respect for equipment; attendance unreliable; misses appointments; data lacking or unreliable; cannot follow simple instructions. No contribution to peer review. Very poor student; lacks motivation, and fails to respond to encouragement; very poor worker; attendance unreliable; misses appointments; data lacking or unreliable; cannot follow simple instructions. Very poor student; lacks motivation, and fails to respond to encouragement; very poor worker; attendance unreliable; misses appointments; data lacking or unreliable; cannot follow simple instructions.
