Difference between revisions of "Limonene Synthase"

From ISMOC
Jump to: navigation, search
(Kinetic Parameter Values)
(Kinetic Parameter Values)
Line 160: Line 160:
 
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''References'''
 
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''References'''
 
|-
 
|-
| Km_gpp_LIMS||47.4||3.8||128||0||LIMS gene from Lavandula angustifolia was expressed in E. coli. The kinetics were measured in vitro at 30°C||Landmann2007
+
| Km_gpp_LIMS||47.4||3.8||128||0||LIMS gene from Lavandula angustifolia was expressed in E. coli. The kinetics were measured in vitro at 30°C||<ref name="Landmann2007">[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003986107003013 Landmann, C., et al.] (2007). "Cloning and characterization of three terpene synthases from lavender (''Lavandula angustifolia'')." Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 465: 417-429.</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
 
| Km_gpp_LIMS||130||NaN||32||0||LIMS gene from Citrus sinensis (orange) was expressed in E. coli. The Km was measured in vitro at 20°C.||Entova2013
 
| Km_gpp_LIMS||130||NaN||32||0||LIMS gene from Citrus sinensis (orange) was expressed in E. coli. The Km was measured in vitro at 20°C.||Entova2013

Revision as of 12:51, 29 November 2018

You can go back to main page of the kinetic model here.

In this model, LIMS is modelled in Escherichia coli and this model is replicating the bacterial system in vivo. As such, in vivo-like conditions such as pH of 7.5 and temperature of 30°C in E. coli is set as the ideal conditions when assigning weights to its parameter. Limonene synthase catalyses the formation of limonene and pyrophosphate from one molecule of geranyl diphosphate (GPP). The following equations show LIMS’s reaction stoichiometry and its corresponding reaction rate using the Michaelis-Menten rate law:




geranyl diphosphate \rightleftharpoons (−)-(4S)-limonene + diphosphate


Equation Rate

The reaction rate for LIMS is modelled using the reversible Michaelis-Menten equation, and is shown below:



V_\mathrm{LimSynth} =  Kcat_\mathrm{LIMS}*[LIMS] * \cfrac {\cfrac{[GPP]}{Km_\mathrm{GPP}} * \left ( 1 - \cfrac {[Limonene]*[PP]}{[GPP]*K_\mathrm{eq}} \right )}{1 + \cfrac {[GPP]}{Km_\mathrm{GPP}} + \cfrac {[Limonene]}{Km_\mathrm{Limonene}}  + \cfrac {[PP]}{Km_\mathrm{PP}}  + \cfrac {[Limonene]*[PP]}{Km_\mathrm{Limonene}*Km_\mathrm{PP}}}

where :

Parameter Description Units
VLimSynth Reaction rate for Limonene Synthase μM/min
KcatLIMS Turnover number for limonene synthase min-1
KmGPP Michaelis-Menten constant for GPP μM
KmLimonene Michaelis-Menten constant for Limonene μM
KmPP Michaelis-Menten constant for PP μM
Keq Equilibrium constant dimensionless
[GPP] GPP concentration μM
[Limonene] Limonene concentration μM
[PP] PP concentration μM

Metabolite Background Information

Long metabolite names are abbreviated in the model for clarity and standard identification purposes.

Metabolite Abbreviation Chemical Formula Molar mass (g/mol) ChEBI ChEMBL PubChem
geranyl diphosphate GPP C10H20O7P2 314.209 17211 41432 445995
(-)-4S-limonene Limonene C10H16 136.24 15384 449062 22311 or 439250
diphosphate PP O7P2 173.94 644102
limonene synthase LimSynth 70.03 kDa [1], 72.4 kDa [2] ; 60kDa [3]; 56 kDa [4]

Parameterisation

Calculating the Equilibrium Constant

Unlike the kinetic parameter values, thermodynamic parameter values such as for equilibrium constant (Keq) are not easily found in literature reports. However, Keq can be calculated from Gibbs Free Energy (ΔG°) using the following equation:



K_\mathrm{eq} = exp \left ( \cfrac {-ΔG^{°'}}{RT} \right )

where;

Keq Equilibrium constant
-ΔG° Gibbs free energy change (kcal/mol)
R Gas constant (0.0019859 kcal/K/mol)
T Absolute temperature (298 K)


Gibbs free energy values for LIMS are obtained from MetaCyc (EC 4.2.3.16) is -28.049988 kcal/mol [5] and Equilibrator [1]. Table 2 summarizes the ΔrG° values found for LIMS and the calculated Keq. These Keq values are given an arbitrary equal weight of 1 as the ΔrG° values obtained were calculated from a group contribution method and do not have any measurement conditions that would allow us to assess the Keq values according to the weighting scheme set out in (insert link here).

ΔrG°(kcal/mol) Keq Error (±) Source Weight
-28.050 3.843E+20 N/A MetaCyc 1
-42.161 ± 2.844 8.711E+30 5.876E+29 Equilibrator 1


Kinetic Parameter Values

Table 2: Km for GPP values for LIMS
Parameter Value Error Weight Error type Description References
Km_gpp_LIMS 47.4 3.8 128 0 LIMS gene from Lavandula angustifolia was expressed in E. coli. The kinetics were measured in vitro at 30°C [6]
Km_gpp_LIMS 130 NaN 32 0 LIMS gene from Citrus sinensis (orange) was expressed in E. coli. The Km was measured in vitro at 20°C. Entova2013
Km_gpp_LIMS 6.8 NaN 32 0 LIMS gene from Cannabis sativa L. var. 'Skunk' plants was expressed in E. coli. The kinetics were measured at 40°C. [7]
Km_gpp_LIMS 0.7 NaN 128 0 LIMS gene from Citrus limon (lemon) was expressed in E. col. Kinetics were measured in vitro at 30°C. Lucker2002
Km_gpp_LIMS 1.25 NaN 16 0 LIMS isolated from Ricciocarpos natans. Kinetics measured at 32°C and pH7.0. [8]
Km_gpp_LIMS 1.8 NaN 32 0 LIMS isolated from Mentha x piperita (peppermint). Kinetics were measured at 30°C. Rajaonarivony1992

BRENDA data

To further enrich the kinetic parameter values for LIMS, parameter values from EC 4 to EC 4.2.3.* that can be obtained from BRENDA is downloaded. These BRENDA data is integrated with the rest of the kinetic parameter values using our ‘BRENDA Add-on’ protocol. In the BRENDA Add-On protocol, we’ve specified six different ‘EC cases’ that are arranged in order of rank. These EC cases are essentially six different datasets of parameter values downloaded from BRENDA that are filtered according to the specific enzyme class and organism of interest. For this case study example, six different ‘EC case’ datasets were downloaded from BRENDA each for Km and Kcat parameters (Tables below).

Table 7: Input matrix for Km values from BRENDA for EC 4.2.3.16 Parameter value and uncertainty is in µM. Each row represents EC case 2 – 6 respectively. EC case 1 is discarded as number of values obtained were <50. . *Uncertainty values in this table correspond to the standard deviation calculated from SEM reported in literature ** Uncertainty type is multiplicative, therefore ‘1’ is defined.
Parameter value Uncertainty* Weight Uncertainty type**
6.80 14.9566 11.9024 1
49 69.0555 7.4390 1
121 36.1126 2.9756 1
500 36.9586 1.4878 1
300 23.8770 0.5951 1
Input matrix for Kcat values from BRENDA for EC 4.2.3.16 Parameter value and uncertainty is in µM. Each row represents EC case 2 – 6 respectively. EC case 1 is discarded as number of values obtained were <50. . *Uncertainty values in this table correspond to the standard deviation calculated from SEM reported in literature ** Uncertainty type is multiplicative, therefore ‘1’ is defined.
Parameter value Uncertainty* Weight Uncertainty type**
2.040 38.2439 9.5610 1
17.400 109.1960 5.9756 1
200.698 177.0428 2.3902 1
192.000 44.6715 1.1951 1
168.000 62.4126 0.4780 1

Parameter estimation

This section can be found HERE

Simulations

Simulations performed can be found HERE.

References

  1. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Gunnewich2008
  2. Turner,G. et. al.1999. "Limonene synthase, the enzyme responsible for monoterpene biosynthesis in peppermint, is localized to leucoplasts of oil gland secretory cells", Plant Physiology 120(3): 879-886
  3. Maruyama, T. et. al. 2002. "Molecular cloning, functional expression and characterization of d-Limonene synthase from Agastache rugosa" Biol. Pharm. Bull. 25(5): 661-665
  4. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Alonso1992
  5. Latendresse M. (2013). "Computing Gibbs Free Energy of Compounds and Reactions in MetaCyc."
  6. Landmann, C., et al. (2007). "Cloning and characterization of three terpene synthases from lavender (Lavandula angustifolia)." Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 465: 417-429.
  7. Günnewich, N., Page, J.E., Köllner, T.G., Degenhardt, J., & Kutchan, T.M 2007. "Functional expression and characterization of trichome-specific (-)-limonene synthase and (+)-α-pinene synthase from Cannabis sativa ". Nat. Prod. Comm. 2(3): 223-232.
  8. Adam, K.-P., et al. (1996). "Partial purification and characterization of a monoterpene cyclase, limonene synthase, from the liverwort Ricciocarpus natans." Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 332(2): 352-356.